De 3 store pÄ 2000-tallet! Engelske midtbanespillere!
-
Topic author - Poser
- Posts: 362
- Joined: 03 Mar 2009, 00:00
- Mood:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Age: 41
De 3 store pÄ 2000-tallet! Engelske midtbanespillere!
Helt siden jeg begynte Ä interressere meg for fotball sÄ har jeg alltid synes at England har hatt noen jÊvli gode midtbanespillere. PÄ 2000 tallet er det sÊrlig 3 stykker jeg mener utmerker seg. Steven Gerrard, Frank Lampard og Paul Scholes. Der er selvfÞlgelig flere som er verdt Ä nevne, men jeg mener at disse 3 utmerker seg ekstra i denne tidsepoken.
NÄ som Steven Gerrard har annonsert sin avskjed fra Liverpool etter innevÊrende sesong og reiser til "pensjonist tilvÊrelsen " i USA, Paul Scholes allerede har vÊrt pensjonist en stund, mens Lampard ogsÄ er pÄ lÄnt tid i England, sÄ hadde det vÊrt arti med en liten poll for Ä finne ut hvem som var best av disse!
NÄ som Steven Gerrard har annonsert sin avskjed fra Liverpool etter innevÊrende sesong og reiser til "pensjonist tilvÊrelsen " i USA, Paul Scholes allerede har vÊrt pensjonist en stund, mens Lampard ogsÄ er pÄ lÄnt tid i England, sÄ hadde det vÊrt arti med en liten poll for Ä finne ut hvem som var best av disse!
Scholes skiller seg relativt greit ut. Andre og tredje er meir vrient, men eg trur eg velgjer Lampard som nummer to.
In the last 15 to 20 years the best central midfielder that I have seen â the most complete â is Scholes. I have spoken with Xabi Alonso about this many times. Scholes is a spectacular player who has everything. He can play the final pass, he can score, he is strong, he never gets knocked off the ball and he doesnât give possession away. If he had been Spanish then maybe he would have been valued more.
Xavi
My toughest opponent? Scholes of Manchester. He is the complete midfielder.
Zinedine Zidane
Rooney is one of the best players in the world and I love watching him play. But if you had to pick out only one, then for their history and for all that they have achieved it would have to be Paul Scholes or Ryan Giggs. They are two shining examples for any player.
Andres Iniesta
Iâm not the best, Paul Scholes is.
Edgar Davids, in his prime
Out of everyone at Manchester United, I would pick out Scholes â he is the best midfielder of his generation. I would have loved to have played alongside him.
Pep Guardiola
I tell anyone who asks me â Scholes is the best English player.
Laurent Blanc
The player in the Premiership I admire most? Easy â Scholes.
Patrick Vieira
He is the one whose level I aspire to. He is the best player in the Premier League.
Cesc Fabregas
I canât understand why Scholes has never won the player of the year award. He should have won it long ago. Maybe itâs because he doesnât seek the limelight like some of the other âstarsâ.
Thierry Henry
Nobody else in the world can play the way Scholes does. The passes he produces all over the field and the way he changes the game is brilliant. Every manager would like him. But luckily he is here and playing with us. Paul practices that all the time. When he has finished training he always goes out and shoots.
Dimitar Berbatov
Why isnât he playing for England? It is crazy. Only in England. Scholes is a great, great player. So experienced and still, for me, one of the best in the world in midfield. Manchester United are lucky to have him.
Jose Mourinho
Paul Scholes had the best football brain Iâd ever seen in a kid. Letâs face it. Paul Scholes is in a class of its own.
Brian Kidd
Paul Scholes would have been one of my first choices for putting together a great team â that goes to show how highly I have always rated him. He would have been one of the first players Iâd have bought, given the chance.
Marcello Lippi
Scholes is undoubtedly the best midfielder of his generation.
Zinedine Zidane
He is a very complete, spectacular footballer. He always fights for the ball and tries to lose his marker to help his team-mates â either to defend or to have a shot on goal. For any football player in the Premiership, Scholes is a player you want to emulate. I would happily end my career with the medals that Scholes has. I am young and I hope that I will be able to surpass him â but it is not going to be easy.
Cesc Fabregas
Juan Sebasticn Veron while at Chelsea being asked in an interview whoâs the best English player : âPaul Scholes.â
Very few players can do that, but Scholes is one of them â and I knew he was one of them. Thatâs why, without question, I think Paul Scholes is the best player in England. Heâs got the best skills, the best brain. No one can match him.
Sir Alex Ferguson
England have lost their best player
George Best after Paul retired from international football
There isnât a player of his mould anywhere in the world.
Glen Hoddle
For me, itâs Paul Scholes. Heâll do ridiculous things in training like say, âYou see that tree over there?â â itâll be 40 yards away â âIâm going to hit itâ. And heâll do it. Everyone at the club considers him the best.â
Rio Ferdinand
I wouldnât swap Paul Scholes for anybody. He is quite simply the most complete footballer I have ever played with. He is the best.
Gary Neville
Heâs always in the right position, always seems to be at the end of the box when the ball drops in. The complete midfielder â when heâs fit, heâs the best. Some go missing but heâs in the right place at the right time. Heâs my favourite player of all-time, unbelievable. If you give him a chance itâs a goal, isnât it?
Micah Richards
We wonât ever see another one like Paul Scholes. He is a legend and a real benchmark. He is not interested in the modern-day footballerâs life off the pitch, but he is a world-class player on it. He has probably never really got the true recognition he deserved outside of Manchester United because he never did the media. He didnât do interviews and never put himself out for things like that. I cannot believe he has never been nominated for World, European or domestic individual honours because in his prime he was scoring 20 goals a season from midfield. It is astonishing he has never won a personal award, but given the choice of winning something and then having to get up and do the speech, I think he would rather not have won them!
Darren Fletcher
Heâs the best one- or two-touch passer in the country. He sees the game unlike any other player.
Terry Venables
If you ask footballers to pick out the player they most admire, so many of them will pick Paul Scholes. He can tackle, and his passing and shooting is of the highest level. Heâs the most consistent and naturally gifted player weâve had for a long, long time.
Alan Shearer
Paul Scholes has been the best England midfield player for 30-odd years. Youâd probably have to go back to Bobby Charlton to find someone who could do as much as Scholes. When the ball arrives at his feet he could tell you where every player on that pitch is at that moment. His awareness is superb.
Gordon Strachan
Scholes is one of the most complete footballers Iâve ever seen. His one-touch play is phenomenal. Whenever I have played against him, I never felt I could get close to him.
Eidur Gudjohnsen
For years Paul Scholes has been one of the best players in the Premiership. Heâs incredible. He has always been under-rated throughout his career. Heâs a team player, a one and two-touch footballer who makes good decisions on the pitch and makes his team play.
Thierry Henry
Sent from my Acer Aspire using Bulgorttalk
Svaret er naturligvis Paul Scholes, og det sier jeg ikke fordi jeg er United-fan. Han er den mest naturlig begava spilleren jeg har sett i Premier League, og var en av Uniteds aller viktigste spillere fra 94 til han la opp fĂžrste gang.
Av Lampard og Gerrard velger jeg Gerrard, fordi han hadde et hÞyere toppnivÄ og hadde to-tre sesonger hvor han nok var topp 10 av spillere i Europa.
Av Lampard og Gerrard velger jeg Gerrard, fordi han hadde et hÞyere toppnivÄ og hadde to-tre sesonger hvor han nok var topp 10 av spillere i Europa.
I never looked around, never second-guessed
Then I read some Howard Zinn now I'm always depressed
And now I can't sleep from years of apathy
All because I read a little Noam Chomsky
Then I read some Howard Zinn now I'm always depressed
And now I can't sleep from years of apathy
All because I read a little Noam Chomsky
-
- Belieber
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 21 Apr 2006, 00:00
- Mood:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Age: 43
Paul Scholes, utan tvil! Ferdigheitsmessig pÄ eit heilt anna nivÄ enn Lampard og Gerrard, utan at det gjer dei to sistnemnde til dÄrlige spelarar.
Jeg skulle likt Ă„ se begrunnelsen for Ă„ velge en annen spiller enn Scholes. Og da er ikke "jeg er Chelsea-fan" eller "jeg er Liverpool-fan" en begrunnelse.
I never looked around, never second-guessed
Then I read some Howard Zinn now I'm always depressed
And now I can't sleep from years of apathy
All because I read a little Noam Chomsky
Then I read some Howard Zinn now I'm always depressed
And now I can't sleep from years of apathy
All because I read a little Noam Chomsky
Enig. Lampard og Gerrard(i den rekkefĂžlgen) er gode som i at de er normale fotballspillere som bare er ekstra gode i det meste. Scholes driver med en annen idrett.Udunpute wrote:Jeg skulle likt Ă„ se begrunnelsen for Ă„ velge en annen spiller enn Scholes. Og da er ikke "jeg er Chelsea-fan" eller "jeg er Liverpool-fan" en begrunnelse.
Har alltid hatet Scholes for mye til Ă„ se han spille.
Svaret blir defor Gerrard. Lampard er ikke en bedre avslutter og en dÄrligere pasningsspiller, selv om Gerrard nok er hakket mere ujevn.
Godt mulig Scholes egentlig er best.
Svaret blir defor Gerrard. Lampard er ikke en bedre avslutter og en dÄrligere pasningsspiller, selv om Gerrard nok er hakket mere ujevn.
Godt mulig Scholes egentlig er best.
Kom gjerne med tal som underbyggjer pÄstanden om at Lampard er ein dÄrlegare avsluttar og pasningsspelar enn Gerrard.DJGADD wrote:Har alltid hatet Scholes for mye til Ä se han spille.
Svaret blir defor Gerrard. Lampard er ikke en bedre avslutter og en dÄrligere pasningsspiller, selv om Gerrard nok er hakket mere ujevn.
Godt mulig Scholes egentlig er best.
Sent from my Acer Aspire using Bulgorttalk
Jeg sa ikke at Lampard var dÄrligere avslutter, men heller ikke bedre.
Jeg mener Gerrard er bedre til Ä skape sjanser pÄ sitt toppnivÄ, selv om han nok er mer ujevn enn Lampard.
à penbart subjektivt uansett. Tall hjelper ikke sÄ mye nÄr de har spilt for forskjellige lag uansett.
Gode er de begge:
http://www.averageopposition.com/2012/0 ... d.html?m=1
Jeg mener Gerrard er bedre til Ä skape sjanser pÄ sitt toppnivÄ, selv om han nok er mer ujevn enn Lampard.
à penbart subjektivt uansett. Tall hjelper ikke sÄ mye nÄr de har spilt for forskjellige lag uansett.
Gode er de begge:
http://www.averageopposition.com/2012/0 ... d.html?m=1
Scholes er vel best, men jeg har alltid hatt sansen for Frank Lampard. Mest fordi jeg syntes det er artig med sÞnna til folk jeg har fotballkort av. Det er en smÄsÊr greie jeg har...